next pick up a bottle of fragrance, give a second’s thought to the
environmental impact of the Gucci, Thierry Mugler, or Dior you’re buying.
Perfumes are believed to imitate nature—so what are the effects of perfume
manufacturing on our natural world?
Perfumes are made of scent molecules—single molecules or collections of molecules, synthesized by chemists in labs or synthesized by nature in trees, grasses, and flowers. The lovely natural rose and orange blossom essences in your bottle of Jo Malone are collections of hundreds of molecules, only some of which actually come from the flowers. Like virtually all perfumes on the market, Jo also contains cis-3-hexanol, galaxolide, and dihydromyrcenol—molecules made in perfume labs.
Synthetic molecules are by no means bad; they are the heart of modern perfumery. The key to Chanel No. 5, for example, is a molecule called aldehyde, first synthesized in the 1880s. Shalimar, created in 1925, is powered by the synthetic 3-methoxy-4-hydroxy-benzaldehyde.
Of course perfumes, like any other chemicals (think water, vitamin C, aspirin), have an ecological impact, and the fragrance industry must spend millions each year minimizing it. Synthetic or natural, it doesn’t matter—rose essence ends up in the air, water, and soil, just like methyl dihydrojasmonate. When JLo sells eight million bottles of Glo a year, she needs to worry about what they do to the environment because, besides perhaps feeling a moral obligation to the planet, she also has to comply with government standards. Likewise, Dior needs to ensure every molecule in Eau Sauvage is eco-compatible.
One of the most popular perfume ingredients ever, found in some 90 percent of all fragrances, is linalool. It’s a molecule found in nature, so whenever you have lavender, bergamot, or coriander in How to build a better rose your perfume, you’ve got linalool. It can also be created by chemical synthesis as pure linalool (the first synthetic linalool was created in the 1920s). This is called a “nature identical” since molecularly, synthetic and natural linalool are—surprise—absolutely the same.
Timbuktu, one of an exquisite collection of scents from the French house L’Artisan Parfumeur, uses linalool. This is a mesmerizing perfume; wearing Timbuktu is like waking late at night from a dream in a dark, ancient desert hotel made of wood that has been blackened with the smoke of incense and the smell of robed visitors, coming and going over the centuries. It is the smell of a character from Kipling. There’s linalool in Carolina Herrera’s new 212 Sexy, which evokes silk and the promising, powdery smell that hits you when you open new, expensive cosmetics.
And like every other ingredient, linalool’s eco-effects were stringently evaluated. How? There are four steps.
Say Miuccia Prada decides she wants
a perfume. She never actually lays a finger on a geranium extract. She (or
more likely her marketing department) writes up a “perfume brief,” a
concept of the fragrance she has in mind. The brief usually goes something
like, “I want
Where does the environment come in?
Let’s say Symrise, the company doing some of the most interesting work
with fragrances these days, wants to produce and sell linalool as a
perfume ingredient. A certain amount of this linalool is going to get
washed from the bodies of the lovely young women who mist themselves with
Gucci every morning, making its way down the drains of Manhattan’s showers
and into the Hudson River. So Symrise needs to conduct tests to determine
how much linalool is going to build up in the environment. First, the
Symrise chemists look at U.S., European, and Japanese government
regulations on required safety data. In the United States, you have to
supply certain information according to what are called “thresholds of
production,” which simply means that the more you make of the stuff (are
you making one ton a year or 1,000 tons?) the stricter the regulations
get. Symrise also has to test what the linalool is going to do to the
ecology of the Hudson. The calculation is hazard + exposure = risk. The
hazard is the toxicity to plants and animals; the exposure is
This is where linalool gets much
tougher testing, since the RIFM goes well beyond Symrise in both rigor and
breadth. RIFM’s more extensive environmental testing results are submitted
to independent experts for review. For example, RIFM does environmental
Copies of the evaluations are then given to all members and published in peer-reviewed journals, and here a limitation could be imposed on linalool’s use. “Based on this material’s potential to cause skin sensitization,” its expert panel might say, “it should be limited to 0.1 percent of the final product.” Then this recommendation is codified as an industry standard by the International Fragrance Association (IFRA). Toxicity standards for the target species of interest— Homo sapiensin this case—usually cap out before environmental standards do. Toxicity testing is the stricter of the two and is generally the first to signal problems with a substance.
Ultimately, Thierry Mugler’s brilliant new masculine B-Men arrives at the perfume counter in Saks Fifth Avenue. Created by the perfumer Jacques Huclier, B-Men smells like a field of spices in a forest of saplings growing under a fresh, clean, blue Indian sky—and thankfully, it won’t spoil any of them. ■
Subscribe to Plenty Magazine
(Lü would like to thank Plenty magazine publisher Mark Spellun for permission to post this article online.)
Back to Lü